Nuclear accident in Fukushima

  That recent events in Japan, opens again the debate of whether energy nuclear: Yes or NO; This debate is not new in the XXI century discuss that kind of power should lead us to the future. Beginning with fire, coal, the oil, etc. various are the sources that have provided us with heat, have allowed that us mobilising and other activities throughout history that have enabled the development world these are more or less pollutants, although not as much as we think, it all depends on the context, for example a current car a BMW 5 series, is a sedan 5 seats with great power and strength; According to some specifications consumes 7.61 lts/100 km and drives out at that distance 178g of Co2 into the atmosphere, for a car with such power is not much, even more, for my consideration could be a so-called ecological vehicle; but, as I said before, it all depends on the context; the estimated current population is 6.775.235.741 whopping billions of inhabitants, now in a speculative exercise imagine that each of those inhabitants have mentioned BMW and multiply it by the 178g of Co2 that is emitted into the atmosphere, now means that some think that the finished planet and bear in mind, that we have not gotten into that account thousands of negative factors such as fuel boats, motorcycles, and/or other vehicles, the car is 2011 model and not all cars in circulation are of that year therefore, consume exponentially more, etc. The human race has realized the need to find alternative energy sources that offer us the comfort of first world without the costs of the first world, for this reason the governments, and private companies should encourage their creation, and although it seems easy to count which is the way to go, there are factors against (aka oil companies) that make it difficult to dump all the efforts on the track which is considered correct if we want to stop air pollution, indeed I firmly believe that until it does not end the oil on the planet Earth its not gonna be taken seriously as it should be the creation of a fuel that we transport from one side to another. And what happens with the Atomic Energy? nuclear power is cleaner than you think, and is quite viable, in fact is an energy which personally I am in favour simply must better manage its operation and the treatment of their waste, great responsibility for the catastrophe of Fukushima is the company administering Tepco of the station, which has allowed this to happen again. I added a link (http://www.elpais.com/articulo/internacional/Tepco/tomo/medidas/suficientes/evitar/accidente/Fukushima/OIEA/elpepuopi/20110404elpepuint_5/Tes) therefore should not per will delete it without before to deeply discuss its benefits, I support nuclear energy, although not in the hands of people like Tepco, therefore I encourage the debate not only on the institutions but also of the citizens is more, I ask for voters to demand from their candidates include this interesting and important controversy in their agendas, the degree of responsibility belongs to everyone and everyone can contribute something, in the end what matters is that there is a habitable planet to future generations, or that or we will have to speed up the plans of colonization of other worlds.